| Comments:
|
- n00b5! V073 4 m3 a1r34dy! --Mortalmm000 13:13, 28 Arche 2011 (UTC)
- WTF? 0 n0es! --Mortalmm000 15:50, 4 Aym 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This is a 2nd nomination.
- I don't think I can vote on this as I haven't the foggiest what's going on. The article literally hurt my eyes. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:47, 20 Aym 2011 (UTC)
- This article isn't going to be f347ur3d! n0es! --Mortalmm000 07:51, 21 Yoon 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand why you people are voting against this. It's a great piece and where else can you feature an article written in leetspeak if not on Illogicopedia? If you really must, there is a perfectly good FireFox extension called "leetkey" specifically written to translate leetspeak to English for you. --Nerd42 04:17, 22 Yoon 2011 (UTC)
- 4gr33d. v07ing against an article just because you can't understand a damn thing is preposterous, particularly on this site, which prides itself in writing stuff nobody understands. Shame on you Against voters! SHAME!!!! --Mortalmm000 14:02, 23 Yoon 2011 (UTC)
- I don't find that content that impressive, myself. That's all. I can read leet just fine, and wouldn't mind having a leet-based article featured, but I'm just not a fan of this article. —rms talk 17:08, 23 Yoon 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't vote against, but the whole idea of the thing makes me cringe. Who's the bloke on the cereal packet? It all seems very in-jokey. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:39, 1 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- What kind of petaQ would actually vote FOR this piece of shit? Kahless (talk) (petaQ)
- someone m0r3 1337 than y0u --Nerd42 03:57, 20 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it needs more work then. I thought people were just voting against it just cause they're anti-leet somehow --Nerd42 03:55, 20 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
|